Core Web Vitals optimization. Green in Search Console, not just Lighthouse.
I fix the exact issues holding back LCP, INP and CLS, prioritized by real field data from your users, not a lab score that nobody experiences.
Problems I fix.
If two of these are you, I can probably have it sorted this week.
- Search Console flags "Poor" or "Needs improvement" URLs
- Lighthouse says 90 but real users still see a slow site
- Layout jumps as fonts, ads and images load
- Interactions lag because of third-party tags and heavy main-thread work
- You need CWV passed before a migration, campaign or ranking push
Everything included. Nothing padded.
Field-data first
Search Console and CrUX decide the priority list. Lab tools only verify the fix.
LCP
Render-blocking resources removed, hero media preloaded, server response tuned.
INP
Long tasks broken up, third-party scripts controlled, event handlers made cheap.
CLS
Fonts, images, embeds and dynamic content get reserved space. No more jumping.
Page-builder compatible
Elementor, Divi, WPBakery and Gutenberg all handled without design changes.
Report you can act on
Before/after metrics, every fix listed, and a ranked backlog of what's left.
From access to proof.
You hand over access. I hand back numbers. Snapshot before, rollback ready, no downtime.
- No downtime
- Rollback ready
- Flat price
- 010–2 hours
Scan
Field data from Search Console and CrUX plus a lab audit. The list is ranked by what real users feel.
- 02Same day
Implement
Render-blocking, layout shift and interaction fixes on staging or in a quiet window.
- 03By 24h
Proof
Lab metrics now; field data turns within Google's 28-day window. Clear report with next steps.
A typical case: a web font that swaps in late, a cookie banner pushed in from the top, images without width and height, and an embedded map that loads into a box with no height. Each one moves the page a little. Reserved space for every element and a preloaded font take CLS under Google's 0.1 threshold, and Search Console follows once 28 days of field data have caught up.
This is for you if
- Search Console shows CWV warnings or failures
- Your site is slow on mobile even though it looks fine
- You want the ranking benefit of passing CWV
- You care about real users, not just a lab score
Not a fit if
- You only care about a Lighthouse screenshot
- Your hosting can't run basic optimization (I'll tell you and suggest options)
- You expect field data to change overnight (Google needs 28 days)
Things people ask before they book.
Do you work from real field data?
Yes. Search Console and Chrome UX Report metrics guide the work, not only Lighthouse. That's what Google actually ranks on.
Is this compatible with Elementor and other builders?
Yes. Builders add dynamic CSS and heavy JavaScript; I load assets selectively and defer non-critical scripts while the design stays intact.
Do you push hosting upgrades?
Only if needed, and I'm transparent about cost versus benefit. Most sites pass CWV on decent shared hosting once optimized. Cloudflare is often the cheapest fix for TTFB.
What's in the report?
Current LCP/INP/CLS from field data, an issue list ranked by impact, every fix with before/after comparisons, screenshots, and a prioritized backlog.
How quickly will I see improvement?
Lab metrics improve immediately. Field data in Search Console uses a 28-day rolling average, so expect full green within a month.
Do you monitor afterwards?
Yes. The Care plan includes regression checks, alerts when scores drop and fixes for issues caused by plugin or content updates.
What if scores don't improve enough?
I dig deeper (hosting limits, third-party scripts, architecture) and lay out the options honestly. I don't bill for work that wasn't going to help.
How much does it cost?
From €390 for basic fixes to around €1,900 for complex sites. Fixed quote up front.
Got a site, a bug, or an idea? Send it over.
You'll get a flat price and a start date today. No pitch deck, no discovery phase.